Hang the judge.
The new America.
So easy to hate!
For your data file...
Some of these clown judges need to start going to jail. They forget who is paying their sorry azzes.
Davis is the one clerk who is outed Christian, and five other clerks said they would do the deed.
But the sodomites went to her specifically, KNOWING it would provoke a confrontation.
Davis is also a Democrat. Is this another setup?
On well, then, she’ll be out today. Or not. I’m betting not.
I understand that deputies have offered (or were assigned) to issue licenses in her absence. Can anyone issue a license or must they come from the clerk? Who authorized them to issue licenses and under what authority did that person act?
And finally, since this is a state issue under what authority does this federal judge act? It would appear to me that he lacks standing to unilaterally interfere in state affairs.
This is the only Law:
Release Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, arrest US District Judge David Bunning.
Homo marriage
Entitled Illegals
No-holds-barred NE Deflatriots
All and more thanks to an out-of-control & exempt judiciary.
Page 5:
Finally, the First Amendment ensures that religions, those who adhere to religious doctrines, and others have protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths.
Page 27:
Finally, it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they have long revered.
If the judge is going to cite the Supreme Court ruling, then where is this protection? Were there not other alternatives short of imprisonment that could have taken first, if they were serious about protecting the First Amendment rights, too, during all of this?
Furthermore, if we are to have a "rule of law," then must stop judicial legislation and let the laws that rule us come from our representatives, not as edicts from a "judge."
Page 5:
(5) There may be an initial inclination to await further legislation, litigation, and debate, but referenda, legislative debates, and grassroots campaigns; studies and other writings; and extensive litigation in state and federal courts have led to an enhanced understanding of the issue. While the Constitution contemplates that democracy is the appropriate process for change, individuals who are harmed need not await legislative action before asserting a fundamental right.
There is the judicial arrogance for all to plainly see. The country doesn't have to wait for the representative process to work, because these few judges have an "enhanced understanding" and know better than the rest of us.
The Separation of Powers doesn't apply to them, and the separation of powers didn't apply to Kim Davis when an appointed judge jailed an elected executive.
-PJ
Frankly, it seems high time the people of Kentucky stop protesting and start demanding that Judge David Bunning and members of the Supreme Court be impeached...
bfl
It's not about law or justice; it's about force. The thugs will compel obedience if they can. That is why they want decent people disarmed.
RE: But His Order Was Against the Law
THIS CANNOT BE EMPHASIZED ENOUGH:
1) KENTUCKY HAS NO LAW LEGALIZING GAY MARRIAGE.
2) KIM DAVIS IS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. Therefore, SHE CANNOT BE FIRED.
The only way she can be removed is via IMPEACHMENT or RECALL ELECTIONS.
Noe of the above were done.
When the Mayor of San Francisco ordered gay marriage licenses to be issued when California DID NOT PASS any gay marriage law, where were the judges then?
Until Congress starts to impeach judges, none of this will stop. Justice Kennedy should be the first target. It may take a dozen further impeachments until the judiciary is brought under control.
A recital of vows is optional for a civil union. Those involved in the union simply sign their names and the contract is complete. The civil union can be celebrated with or without a reception.
Holy Matrimony continues to be a religious commitment between a man and woman where they promise to be faithful to one another 'til death do us part'.