Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RginTN

I’m pretty sure the holding of the cases directs clerks to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in these cases at the end of the day. That’s how the cases got to SCOTUS to begin with.

Neil and Bob decided to get try to get “married” at the clerk’s office, a clerk told them, sorry, not in this state.


39 posted on 09/03/2015 9:43:25 PM PDT by NYRepublican72 (Democrats -- it's always someone else's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: NYRepublican72

You still don’t get it!!! She is not discriminating against these gays because no one is getting marriage licenses from her office. If I were her I would post a big sign in her office saying, “Sorry but we are not issuing marriage licenses in 2015 and 2016” “We suggest you try the neighboring counties”


58 posted on 09/03/2015 10:40:31 PM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: NYRepublican72
I’m pretty sure the holding of the cases directs clerks to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in these cases at the end of the day.

That means the courts can write law, as opposed to interpreting them. Again, existing KY law explicitly makes homosexual "marriage" illegal.

83 posted on 09/04/2015 5:37:20 AM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson