[Cboldt]

Most of the press FOIA's were met with opinions that said law enforcement could withhold the material requested. But yeah, I understand and agree that "There was a lot more requested than names of those detained but not arrested." That just happens to be information that the Texas AG says is public.

-- Still, who knows what one of those 62 might know? --

They are witnesses, and as such, are under that blanket gag order. One of these days, the accused will obtain the right to speak on their own behalf, and the witnesses will be allowed to speak their minds on the subject.

[don-o]

They are witnesses, and as such, are under that blanket gag order.

Now I am confused. I thought the gag order applied to Broden and his client Clendennen. Was every other defendant and attorney served with this order?