Oh, I grasp that in many cases you side-step the points I make and authorities I cite. You'll recall all those posts where I say you're striking your ostrich pose. And your new technique -- the Appeal to Unidentified Evidence -- isn't so much talking past me as it is not talking at all.
I'm not reasoning with you, i'm showing you to be a fool.
And you do that by ducking points, avoiding substantive argument, and resorting to ad hominem? Every time you've claimed I've ignored facts or misstated them or "shoveled aside" your arguments (pretty snow plow picture and all) I've challenged you to NAME ONE INSTANCE and document that. Each time you've failed.
So your not being able to substantiate a single point shows me to be a fool? Gosh, how does that work? You've got your Projection Machine flashing on the big screen again.
No answer to the Indian citizenship thing, eh? Maybe after you’ve thunk on it or something.