Yes. I have come to the point in my scientific explorations that the Scripture is true, and any theory developed that directly contradicts the plain reading of scripture cannot be.
QUOTE: ...declaring your own pride by demeaning others...
If you feel demeaned, my apologies, but your taking offense is no reason to shrink from posting scripture.
However, in the Pot-Kettle department, you offered some interesting (demeaning?) descriptions of Moses with
Quote: "...I assert a common schoolchild may know more about astronomy than Moses..." post 57
and
"...nearly prehistoric goat-herder who didn’t grok(sic) quantum cosmology, doesn’t mean God did things in a way that puny ignoramuses conclude covers a hundred back-to-back lifespans..." post 15
and
"...a couple pages of goatherder-understandable text plus a genealogy does not prove the age of the Universe..." post 57
We will all stand before Jesus Christ, and be held accountable for every word we speak. I would rather err on the side of a literal interpretation of what He went to the trouble of having written down for my benefit, than trying to explain why I believed theories that violated his simple text.
For example, consider:
Exodus 20:11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day:
You develop theories that directly contradict plain scripture, I assert the plain reading is true. I am quite comfortable in my position, as I trust you are.
Where’s the plain scripture declaring a 10,000 year old Earth?