Posted on 08/22/2015 4:24:27 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I was a little hesitant about Donald Trump when he first burst onto the scene. However, the longer this goes on and I read the vitriol and the suppressed outrage of the liberal enemy media, I begin to realize Donald Trump IS our best hope for actually getting the ball rolling to removing most of the Congressmen and women from office and the wretches that infest half of the Supreme Court along with all of the major media heads and their minions. No other candidate will fight to get people replaced who are NOT doing what is necessary to get things turned around.
It is becoming more and more obvious that even Blacks and Hispanics who have a vested interest in this country also support what he is saying and wants to DO. The simple formula for whether he is right for the country IS the enemy media's explosive reaction to him. People who can not stand the corrupt government and media are feeding on the negativity of those opposing Trump, realizing that what is enraging the leftists is right for the nation. What horrifies the left is right.
So what exactly is your reason for believing the media hates Trump?
They[’re calling Trump supporters Nazis and racists already. Doesn’t get any more “hateful” than that.
As you've made "special pleading" your trademark, what you "keep saying" means very little.
However, most rational adults understand they don't have to change their opinions to support someone who doesn't share those opinions.
If they hated Trump they wouldn’t cover him. Same way they’ve always done.
This is Trump and his friends in the media pulling one over on the rubes again.
Don’t worry, Trump has happily provided them with 30 years of dirt to destroy him with if you’re dumb enough to nominate him. If Mike Huckabee or Rick Santorum had said they don’t want black guys counting their money, the media wouldn’t be keeping their mouths shut. With Trump they’ll use it when they need it.
Funny watching FReepers shift with the wind. With McCain and Romney the complaint was that they cover them because they want them to be the nominee so they can be defeated.
Means enough for you to respond and try to refute it, I see.
"However, most rational adults understand they don't have to change their opinions to support someone who doesn't share those opinions"
Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, "rational adults" will ask themselves, "Why am I, as a conservative, supporting this Democrat?"
Living with Obama's laws is what you want to live with for the next 4, 8, 40 years? Psst, this is FR not DU.
You realize that Obama was never going to submit the Iran agreement as a treaty. So, the congressional action simply forced President Obama to at least show it to congress instead of simply ignoring congress and taking it to the UN.
Do you realize that Trump is one of the only candidate who has said that he would continue the Iran deal if elected. Cruz and most of the other candidates say that they would end it if elected and force Iran to drop its Nuclear program whereas Trump simply claims that he will do a better job of enforcing Obama’s agreement.
Having it voted by Congress is worse than any secret deal Obama did by himself (which by definition wouldn’t last beyond his term in office anyway).
Generally, I do try to respond to those who disagree with my posts.
Keep telling yourself that.
As you've provided no substantive reason not to, I will.
Yes, I know that, and I don’t support that. But Trump is only just working out his actual policies now. He’s done immigration and will come out with his economic plan within a couple of weeks. (You saw a hint of that last night, when he said he was a free trader, as long as you had smart leaders. That was his pivot from his protectionist threats.)
Cruz was a Senator in office and voting when he voted for that abomination—regardless of the GOPE excuses for rolling over yet again for Barry.
If they hated Trump they wouldn’t cover him. Same way they’ve always done.
This is Trump and his friends in the media pulling one over on the rubes again.
Don’t worry, Trump has happily provided them with 30 years of dirt to destroy him with if you’re dumb enough to nominate him. If Mike Huckabee or Rick Santorum had said they don’t want black guys counting their money, the media wouldn’t be keeping their mouths shut. With Trump they’ll use it when they need it.
Funny watching FReepers shift with the wind. With McCain and Romney the complaint was that they cover them because they want them to be the nominee so they can be defeated.
Here is Rolling Stone reporter spreading the “love” to Trump by insinuating he is a Nazi and is the responsible for an assault in Boston:
Btw, It’s funny to see FReepres so fixated on one candidate they can’t see the forest through the trees. I was 100% all in for Cruz until he jumped in the sack with Paul Amnesty Ryan to enable Obama’s secret trade deals.
Now I a free agent open to any candidate who can break up the beltway cartel. So far it is Trump with the momentum but if it changes I could easily back Cruz if he is the candidate. You’d be wise to adopt a similar open minded posture, FRiend.
Congress has never voted to approve the Iran deal. They simply voted to force Obama to submit the deal to them and require him to drop the deal if 2/3 of congress did not approve it. I would have preferred that they find some way to force Obama to submit the agreement as a treaty but they had no leverage to do so and this legislation didn’t hurt us like you are claiming. It certainly did not ratify the agreement as a treaty because that still requires a 2/3rds vote of the senate.
Cruz was a Senator in office and voting when he voted for that abomination—regardless of the GOPE excuses for rolling over yet again for Barry.
Cruz made a big mistake running for Senate, IMO. Now he’s got beltway stink on him and unfiar reputation as a fringe figure. He’d have been better waiting to run for governor.
No, that’s not right. It is deemed passed, because of the bill Cruz voted for, if a mere 1/3 of the Senate approves it.
That is terrible, and that Cruz then goes out condemning Obama for it is outrageous.
Trump is no Elephant. He is an ass. His candidacy will benefit most the party with the ass as a logo.
If you’re looking for a nice guy loser candidate may I suggest Santorum? We need fighters to stop the rampaging marxists. Mr. Rodgers in a vest isn’t going to win elections in the age of kardashian. We need a win in 2016. Badly.
Its weird that people want to hold Sen. Cruz, who has regularly fought the establishment on our behalf to a standard of absolute perfection. Any time that they disagree with him, usually just on tactics, they are willing to disqualify him. Then those same people are willing to support Trump who has consistently been liberal, donated primarily to liberals, criticized conservatives, and abused the governments right of eminent domain to steal peoples property as long as he sounds tough on immigration. This despite the fact that four years ago he criticized Romney for being too extreme on immigration. The guy is absolutely playing conservatives and I am ashamed how many freepers are falling for it.
It is not deemed to be ratified. You misunderstand what happened.
When Ted turns on Trump, I’ll turn on Trump. That reasonable?
Welcome to the club.
And it is not just the MSM. You know you are on the right track when the political elites are so motivated against a candidate as the GOPe is against Trump.
They say he is not a conservative, but they most certainly are not conservatives. They say a wall will not work even as their policy of open borders & unenforced laws is creating chaos & death. They lie with abandon.
Trump terrifies all of Washington, DC who fear he may not just “fire” many of them, but that he may also jail some of them, too. A Trump controlled Justice Dept., headed by Trey Gowdy as Trump has suggested, makes me giddy with anticipation. An EPA gutted of the 87% non-essential employees, prohibited from ever mentioning global warming again, makes me almost dizzy with delight. Koskinen & Lerner of the IRS, plus Clinton in prison garb is too much to hope.
Trump is certainly not perfect, but aside from Carson & maybe Cruz, which of the other RINOs on that debate stage will aggressively reverse Obamunism or even talk about it? Which is most likely to take control of our borders? Which is most likely to restore American prestige around the world & give our enemies reason to rethink their evil plans? Which will diminish the influence of the lobbyists & crony capitalists?
IMO, only Trump is uniquely qualified to do the above.
My dream team Presidency in Jan. 2017:
Trump - President
Cruz - VP
Gowdy - AG
Carson - HHS & VA
Guilliani - Homeland Security
Defense - (open to suggestions)
State - (open to suggestions)
Note that all Trump appointments will be brilliant, aggressive people or else Trump will not be able to respect them professionally. He doesn’t hire mealy-mouthed weasels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.