To: pgkdan
But the stupidity of a restaurateur making this a part of the menu? I mean, of course somebody is going to sue. Someone is DYING to get hit by a roll so they can sue. Idiots.
6 posted on
08/14/2015 6:49:00 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: miss marmelstein
But the stupidity of a restaurateur making this a part of the menu? I mean, of course somebody is going to sue. Someone is DYING to get hit by a roll so they can sue. Idiots.That's exactly what I thought the first time I saw this place on TV. I thought they've GOT to be nuts! People want to sue you for looking crossed eyed at them...even if you have crossed eyes!
18 posted on
08/14/2015 6:55:31 AM PDT by
pgkdan
(But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: miss marmelstein
It’s called fun. And if it’s so boorish and deadly, maybe she should go somewhere else.
24 posted on
08/14/2015 7:02:41 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
To: miss marmelstein
theyve been doing it for decades. im amazed it’s taken this long actually. restaurant is kind of a “largest balll of twine” attraction down there so they are doing alright money wise. they should just pay her bills and move on.
To: miss marmelstein
Tough to say. I think the woman has no more of a case than someone who gets hit by an errant foul ball at a baseball game or a flying piece of tire at an auto race. In a sane society, anyway . . .
65 posted on
08/14/2015 7:57:23 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson