Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
"So Lincoln started a war that killed 670.000 for your stated reason."

For Union? Yeah, I would say that I'm pretty well satisfied that that's why it was fought, for the Federalist side.

Remember: I'm a Texan ... through and through. I've done a good amount of reading and believe that I could make arguments going in both directions on who started the war and why. I think that the Confederate States were correct to push the issue, but shouldn't have been surprised when they found that their opponent was just as "bull-headed" as they were. Neither side was going to pull back on their basic positions; it could have only been decided on the battlefield.

Oh, if only Jackson hadn't been killed at Chancellorsville and, to add further to the dream, if Sherman had decided to stay with Louisiana at the beginning of the war.

366 posted on 08/17/2015 1:55:55 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]


To: PeaRidge
"Remember: I'm a Texan ... through and through."

And Hood was an idiot incompetent after being promoted to Corps/Army Command.

367 posted on 08/17/2015 1:59:18 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

To: BlueLancer
I think the relevant question few choose to ask is: Did Lincoln start the war to preserve the Union or to maintain the revenue stream?

4/23/1861 According to an article in the Baltimore Sun of 23 on this date, Mr. Lincoln revealed his opposition to peace: “Another effort was made to move Abraham Lincoln to peace. On the 22nd, a deputation of six members from each of the five Christian Associations of Young Men in Baltimore, headed by Dr. Fuller, and eloquent clergyman of the Baptist church, went to Washington and had an interview with the President. It was reported that he received them with a sort of rude formality.

Dr. Fuller said, that Maryland had first moved in adopting the constitution, and yet the first blood in this war was shed on her soil; he then interceded for a peaceful separation, entreated that no more troops should pass through Baltimore, impressed upon Mr. Lincoln the terrible responsibility resting on him – that on him depended peace or war – a fratricidal conflict or a happy settlement.

‘But,’ said Lincoln, ‘what am I to do?’

‘Let the country know that you are disposed to recognize the Southern Confederacy,’ answered Dr. Fuller, ‘and peace will instantly take the place of anxiety and suspense and war may be averted.’

‘And what is to become of the revenue?’ rejoined Lincoln, ‘I shall have no government, no resources!’ “

368 posted on 08/17/2015 2:18:19 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson