Posted on 08/09/2015 7:22:02 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas
"I wanted a wife and she wanted a wife we both needed someone to cook and clean and support us. She has very much a Type-A personality. I couldn't imagine her staying at home. She needed more of a Type-B husband.
(Excerpt) Read more at liberalamerica.org ...
I'm getting the impression from his that he felt that divorce was worth every penny.
I'll bet he still cringes when he hears her go into that hammer voice if he's clicking past her show on Fox News.
That was nothing resembling a debate
What you wrote bears repeating. Also if Trump is such as tough gut why does he need the protection of his fan base?
Why the constant attack on Megyn Kelly?? My view was that the Fox panel asked the type of tough, hard hitting questions we should expect at a debate; if Trump cant handle them (and he reacted like a 16 year old boy) then he doesnt deserve to be president. Frankly, I am sick of the debates where the tough questions are on the order of Why are you so wonderful, Mrs. Clinton? We live in a world of threats and the threat of socialism engulfing us in this wonderful country; a man who simply reacts with insults to every perceived slight or insulting question is not going to be able to do the job. Im not a Rino or moderate and Trump has raised some very good issues that Boehner and McConnell are scared to come near, but if he wilts like he has the past week there is no way he can handle the crap that the Dems and their media sycophants will throw at him.
So, while ISIS is overrunning the east, terrorists are targeting our military at home, the inner cities are in turmoil, our economic decline is being managed by the president of the USA, the former secretary of state may soon be under a Federal indictment, our ambassador to Libya was murdered in the most cold-blooded, brutal way, our politicians are stealing our tax monies, YOU are upset that Donald Trump talked back to a girl. This morning, despite all the troubles I have listed, Chuck Todd decided the most important subject of the day was whether Donald Trump insulted Bette Midler. I give up!
Megyn Kelly approached that debate like a star out to douse a few hopefuls. Her first question to Trump was about his spat with Rosie O’Donnell. Who cares about that. Trump got the biggest laugh about that. Megyn attacked Trump on her show recently with the fake rape story. False. Really, Megyn? I can see her on FOX this morning doing damage control.
Trump could have been taken down on lots of stuff, do you really think he is up on foreign affairs? I am sure he could have been taken down with a serious question. Instead it was all tabloid crap.
Megyn closed the debate with her gotcha God question of Cruz meant to take him down a peg. Her trademark mocking smirk planted on her face. Cruz handled it very well, by the way.
In my opinion, Megyn had her RINOism showing as she went after Trump and the conservative icon, Ted Cruz. She is dead to me. Sick of her prima donna status.
Check out her Howard Stern interview and her cheesy sexy pictures. Enough of this bimbo. If she wants to be taken seriously, she must act the part.
FOX, overall, did a lousy job. The first debate was so much better. So what went wrong? FOX got their ratings coup, at a loss in the long run. DH turned on FOX this morning, I wouldn’t have. Sick of them.
IMO, we need a George Patton clone to run.
I’ve noticed the same thing
Yeah, they really went after Obambi both times, didn’t they?
Or Billy C too.
In spite of covered with warts, Dems get free passes. Just look at the cover up of Obama’s records and the magazine covers with the halos and mentions of “Messiah” Or the terrible record in Arkansas under Clinton. Or the lack of coverage on Hill’s emails, destruction of evidence, Huma connections, et al
Disgusting. No wonder we have such crap leadership. The MSM is Public Enemy No. 1.
Wonder if she can cook makroooney and cheese??
I tend to believe your comment is generally applicable to different families of ‘foreign’ origin. I recall the days of my youth when my brother and I went out of the house to play ball instead of listening to a lot of Russian talk. I had German playmates who had the same experience. My wife is from Sweden and she talks in Swedish to her sister all the time. As such I agree with your question.
Bush. He is the foil, selected by the Uni-Party, to insure Hitlerys Coronation
**********************
The spectacle of professional wrestling has more suspense than the 2016 presidential election. The fix is in.
Google search engine not Catspajamas search engine. My computer automatically goes to drudge and F.R. I have to use a crowbar to get it to liberal pages. Come on. Megyn likes to give titillating headlines. Just trying to help her out with her audience. They need to know whats inside the closet she is firing sniper rounds from that’s all.
Maybe not policy or issue questions, but were surely questions that pertained to electability. That show of hands thing at the beginning was absolutely called for. Trump himself has made this an issue by his teasing, dancing around a definitive answer on the third party run thing and finally was called to account. I was glad to see him pushed to answer, although his “If they are nice to me I won’t run as third party” sounded petty.
These are supposed to be grownups playing in the big leagues. A presidential campaign is hard and they will face much worse that Megan Kelly the farther along they go. Either get over it or get out of it.
******
Kelly vs. Trump "blood" comment:
1. Why doesn't a reporter/tv commentator ask Kelly what she thought about Trump's "blood"?
2. I think it is a fair question to ask her: Did she believe that Trump's blood comment referred to her period?
3. So far, I have listened as just about every tv political commentator and Republican candidate on earth has crucified Trump over what THEY thought Trump meant, but I haven't heard one word from Kelly as to what Kelly herself thought Trump said and meant.
4. Also, political commentators conveniently seem to forget that Trump also described Chris Wallace as having "blood in his eyes".
5. My point is this: Suppose that Trump had said something like this about Chris Wallace during the CNN Lemon show the night after the debate:
"You could see the blood in his eyes...wherever."
Would the anti-Trump people also suddenly jump up and shout that Trump was viciously talking about Wallace's period? I don't think so.
6. Imagine this happening in the future: We hear President Trump publicly commenting on a recent meeting with Russian leader Putin:
"Poor Putin. You could see the blood in his eyes and wherever."
Really, would anyone in his right mind---including Putin himself---think that Trump was talking about Putin's period. Of course not.
7. Also, Trump has been married several times. Why not ask his past wives and present wife what they thought about Trump's blood comment.
8. Trump also has grown children, so why not ask them, especially, his daughter, what they thought about Trump's blood comments.
EXCELLENT .
FR fellas...it wasn't feminusts who ruined relations between men and women...it was the advent of porn, where men fell into the temptation of having sex with "graven images"--now a normal woman can't arouse you, but fetishes. Mailing in an internet purchased woman is not going to accomplish that, either. Now I'm reading about Oculus and a whole new world of porn...
After Anthony Kennedy gave the country queer “marriage” maybe she wants a woman to marry.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/megyn-kelly-mike-huckabee-supreme-court-gay-marriage
Put that on Breitbart, too. Kellypoon. What Fox is really selling
Except Megyn asked a question that wasn’t an actual debate question where the candidates could argue a point and a counterpoint. She asked a personal question, and to his credit, Trump gave an honest answer and didn’t try to run away from it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.