Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Leep
Winning the debate doesn’t translate in winning the Presidency. Newt tore them up.

There's a flaw in your reasoning - if Newt had continued his strategy in Iowa early and then in SC, I think he would have won the Presidency. He stopped "tearing them up" in Florida. How? Because he quit focusing so brilliantly on Obama, Democrats in Congress, Reid, Pelosi, lib judges, lib unions, lib academics, and libs in media......and started obsessing on Romney. And it was over.

To fully test your theory, we'd need to see a Newt type performance carried all the way through. The good Newt tore them up. The bad Newt imploded...but the debates are the single biggest factor in both Newt's rise and Newt's fall.

14 posted on 08/01/2015 7:38:33 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

While you and I butt heads on some issues, I agree 100% about Newt. It was his to lose, and he lost.


20 posted on 08/01/2015 7:45:44 AM PDT by Catsrus (WWWW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

“started obsessing on Romney. And it was over”

EVery “Republican” seems to shoot themselves in the foot. Usually, when it appears they are gaining momentum?
At some point McCain, Newt, Romney seem to have it all about sewn up And then they crash and burn?

Do they or do they take the fall?


23 posted on 08/01/2015 7:50:22 AM PDT by Leep (Still living in what remains of 'God's Country'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson