Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillview man arrested for shooting down drone; cites right to privacy
WDRB.com ^ | July 28, 2015 | Ryan Cummings

Posted on 07/29/2015 7:19:24 AM PDT by Rodamala

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Rodamala

I do believe that the courts have determined that your property lines extend vertically (and possibly, infinitely?) unless, like subterranean property lines (AKA: mineral rights) you have exchanged those rights for recompense.

Think: military fly zones.


41 posted on 07/29/2015 8:07:44 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (BREAKING: Boy Scouts of America Changes Corporate Identity to "Scouting for Boys in America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Sounds good but...

I ain’t cleaning your gun, brother!


42 posted on 07/29/2015 8:09:18 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (BREAKING: Boy Scouts of America Changes Corporate Identity to "Scouting for Boys in America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: epow

The loss of the drone would be proven if operator was recording the live feed from the camera. Of course, depending on what else was recorded, he may not want to submit such evidence to the court.


43 posted on 07/29/2015 8:09:51 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Seriously though, a drone with a camera could be a peeping Tom’s dream come true.

Not to mention snooping for things to steal for fun and profit, monitoring the movements of potential burglary targets, etc.

44 posted on 07/29/2015 8:12:53 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Jammers might work for a while, as long as they’re not used continuously (FCC will be on you), but with state of the art sensors and processors, a drone losing the signal from base would merely put it into fail safe mode to return to base via inertial navigation.

Don’t know if they’re that sophisticated yet, but they will. Heck, they’ll have them fully autonomous and programmable (commercially) if they aren’t already.


45 posted on 07/29/2015 8:18:27 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: epow
If a drone ever hovers over my home or yard it will be shot out of the sky by a load of #6 bird shot from my Remington shotgun. . . . But in either case it would be hard to prove that the loss of a drone actually occurred if there is no proof that the drone was ever in the immediate vicinity of my property.

S S S

:-)

46 posted on 07/29/2015 8:23:00 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate. [URL=http://media.photobucket.com/user/currencyjunkie/me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
a drone losing the signal from base would merely put it into fail safe mode to return to base via inertial navigation.

If you did that enough times hopefully the operator would realize that the drone is not welcome in certain parts. His craft is intact, and you aren't causing any damage.

47 posted on 07/29/2015 8:23:10 AM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Escalation. Yep that’s the way it started. We’d send up a scout plane for recon, they’d send up a plane with a guy and a gun to shoot it down. Then we’d send up planes to shoot at the other guy in a plane with a gun and thus was the birth of the fighter aircraft.

Fighter drones may actually come about quicker in the civilian world than the military one. Who knows.


48 posted on 07/29/2015 8:23:11 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
Does the drone owner have an unlimited right to air space over people’s homes without their permission and without consequence?

No. According to the federal airspace rules, radio control model airplanes are limited to no more than 400' altitude.

Also, they cannot fly over buildings and must be kept at least 100' from people.

R/C aircraft must also be flown specifically by line of sight. They cannot be flown first-person video (FPV)

Naturally, a lot of drone owners disregard these rules and do whatever they darn well please.

I have no sympathy for these idiots. They got what they deserved. I hope the shotgun blast did significant damage to their drone. The only reason they were flying so low was to shoot video. (read: peeping tom)

49 posted on 07/29/2015 8:23:56 AM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Yea, hopefully, but we’re not always talking about deep thinkers either.


50 posted on 07/29/2015 8:24:40 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

A few years ago, some angry hunters blew a drone out of the sky being operated by some animal rights activist. Anyone remember how that one finally turned out?


51 posted on 07/29/2015 8:25:09 AM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

“Fighter drones may actually come about quicker in the civilian world than the military one. Who knows.”

Oh, there already is one- as one commenter said after viewing the video “the world just got a whole lot scarier”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqHrTtvFFIs


52 posted on 07/29/2015 8:28:17 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
Or . . .


53 posted on 07/29/2015 8:28:55 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate. [URL=http://media.photobucket.com/user/currencyjunkie/me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
"They asked me, 'Are you the S-O-B that shot my drone?' and I said, 'Yes I am,'" he said. "I had my 40mm Glock on me..."

Helluva caliber.

54 posted on 07/29/2015 8:30:12 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Republicans are nothing more than "beards" for Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Jury nullification.

Hopefully, but only after the shooter has spent thousands of dollars on lawyer's fees.

If I were charged with shooting the drone I would sue the drone's owner for invading my privacy. In any event, I don't believe a jury would find the shooter guilty of a crime since they would know that some other drone's owner could fly his drone over their property with impunity based on a conviction of the property owner in this case.

On another much more serious note, my son is a pilot for a major airline and he knows of at least one flight crew that has been virtually blinded by a laser during a critical landing procedure. That crime is far more dangerous than anything a drone could possibly do, and the perp is almost impossible to find. Maybe after a few hundred passengers are killed as a result of some teenager's fun and games played with a laser the feds will get serious about stopping that criminal activity and prosecuting the offenders to the full extent of the law.

55 posted on 07/29/2015 8:32:57 AM PDT by epow (Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
The proper weapon is basically a line with a small weight on the end.

Fired by crossbow or gun, connected to reel.
Or even a fishing rig.

Rope that peeper and bring it down.

56 posted on 07/29/2015 8:44:51 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yea, it did.


57 posted on 07/29/2015 8:59:03 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
The only reason they were flying so low was to shoot video. (read: peeping tom)

Yup. They claimed they were taking pictures of a friend's house, but if so there's no reason they would have been flying over a bunch of random houses.. they would only need to fly around their own house.
58 posted on 07/29/2015 9:20:37 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: epow

My best to your son, who I’ll likely be flying with.


59 posted on 07/29/2015 9:39:15 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Thanks for the good wishes Doug, his mom and I pray for his safety every day.


60 posted on 07/29/2015 10:45:39 AM PDT by epow (Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson