Skip to comments.
'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four hours
The Telegraph ^
| July 28, 2015
| Sarah Knapton
Posted on 07/28/2015 11:20:36 AM PDT by Mellonkronos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: ThomasMore
21
posted on
07/28/2015 11:42:13 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Mellonkronos
“It produces thrust by using solar power”
Doesn`t work at night at all.
22
posted on
07/28/2015 11:44:41 AM PDT
by
bunkerhill7
(("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")))))
To: VRWCmember
"But where will we get the dilythium crystals to run the thing?"
Dilythium crystals are for the warp drive silly! Every 1st year Star Fleet Cadet knows that!
23
posted on
07/28/2015 11:44:42 AM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: SampleMan
Unmanned vehicle could handle constant 3+ g’s, but doubtful a human could and be worth anything once there.
24
posted on
07/28/2015 11:45:25 AM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: massgopguy
lol.... not sure of the thrust needed to slow down enough to go into orbit around the moon...but I would assume it would be huge...with a load of time needed to decrease speed at a reasonable g force. But I believe someday we’ll have this technology and greater.
25
posted on
07/28/2015 11:46:40 AM PDT
by
ThomasMore
(Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
To: bunkerhill7
And its always dark in space. So obviously this thing won’t work.
To: Mellonkronos
Good luck, and thanks for all the fish.
27
posted on
07/28/2015 11:51:03 AM PDT
by
JusPasenThru
(but if not...)
To: Mellonkronos
The other ‘new’ approach is to use the solar wind. It produces a very little acceleration, but that acceleration continues to build up the velocity with time, to very high values, because there is no friction and air drag in space.
28
posted on
07/28/2015 11:51:21 AM PDT
by
expat2
To: Mellonkronos
29
posted on
07/28/2015 11:54:02 AM PDT
by
Jaxter
(Si vis pacem para bellum.)
To: Paul46360
30
posted on
07/28/2015 11:54:18 AM PDT
by
nomad
To: Resolute Conservative
Yep, hope they got good brakes. Or they could just us parachute ... right?
31
posted on
07/28/2015 11:54:40 AM PDT
by
loungitude
(The truth hurts.)
To: ThomasMore
“The problem is slowing down.”
Good point. By my rough math you would be travelling at about 50 million miles an hour by the time you reach Alpha Centauri 100 years from now.
You’d barely have time to take a picture out the window.
To: Lee'sGhost
33
posted on
07/28/2015 11:58:27 AM PDT
by
Darteaus94025
(Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
To: ThomasMore
“The problem is slowing down.”
The article hints that there is no conservation of momentum, so start/stop acceleration may not be a problem.
34
posted on
07/28/2015 11:59:24 AM PDT
by
DBrow
To: Mellonkronos
I’ve read about this before. I was unaware that they’d managed to get it to produce any large effects. If so, that’s bloody awesome. I doubt something like this can be used to escape the earth’s gravity well, but once out there, it opens up some interesting possibilities. Inter-solar exploration would be greatly enhanced if we had propulsive systems in our probes as well.
35
posted on
07/28/2015 12:08:15 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(The best defense against a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun)
To: lapsus calami
Sounds like it would work a lot better than that buggy Improbability Drive. Improbability fields are inherently dangerous, as the more improbable a given thing is, the more likely it is to actually occur in the field. Bistromathematics is a great improvement. Can't wait to go see Disaster Area!
36
posted on
07/28/2015 12:11:33 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(The best defense against a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun)
To: bigdaddy45
>>> And its always dark in space. So obviously this thing wont work. <<<
Obviously. When it’s dark you need a wind generator.
Problem solved.
37
posted on
07/28/2015 12:17:29 PM PDT
by
JJ_Folderol
(Diagonally parked in a parallel universe...)
To: antidisestablishment
I always thought that Transparent Aluminum was just another way of saying Aluminum Oxide. ;-)
38
posted on
07/28/2015 12:19:18 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
We can’t build it, not only was it developed by an oppressive white guy, but it will also make muslims feel bad about their contributions to math and science
39
posted on
07/28/2015 12:19:44 PM PDT
by
dsrtsage
(One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
To: Mellonkronos
40
posted on
07/28/2015 12:30:22 PM PDT
by
jimjohn
(You don't get the kind of government you want, or the kind you need. You get the kind you deserve.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson