I posted some comments at the article itself so if you want to read what a former archaeologist thought about it, please go to it.
Not impressed by the writing or even the theories involved.
This isn’t theories. This is done by researchers and based on an analysis, OK? It’s true because things that are written down and published must be true. Nobody would conspire to mislead or manipulate people just for prestige, power and/or money. Let’s cut the cynicism people, OK?
>>I posted some comments at the article itself<<
0 comments
Guess they don’t like dissent; must be Libs, but we knew that.