Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Partisan Gunslinger

“So you’re saying because the north didn’t use their full resources to return slaves to their “masters” that the southern states were not bound by anything in the Constitution.”

That’s what Daniel Webster said. Read it for yourself.

Note to self: P.G. disagrees with Daniel Webster.

“I believe in states following the Constitution when they want to leave . . .”

Please post the language of the Constitutional procedure for leaving the union whose existence you infer.


601 posted on 07/30/2015 9:57:19 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
That’s what Daniel Webster said. Read it for yourself.

And Webster's opinion on when states should follow the Constitution matters because?

Note to self: P.G. disagrees with Daniel Webster. “I believe in states following the Constitution when they want to leave . . .” Please post the language of the Constitutional procedure for leaving the union whose existence you infer.

Pretty easy. South Carolina wants to secede. South Carolina takes their proposal to the Congress so Congress can decide how South Carolina will prove it's secession to the other states. Terms are reached regarding Fort Sumter and any other debts South Carolina owes or is owed. Federal facilities in the state are reckoned with and on a certain date when everything is settled to the satisfaction of the other states, the union is dissolved.

Instead, they stole stuff and tried to murder American soldiers.

603 posted on 07/30/2015 10:22:53 AM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson