Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Team Cuda

Isn’t it true that the criteria for being charged with treason against the United States, the perpetrator would need to be a person owing allegiance to the United States? The Confederacy had formally declared itself a separate entity from the United States. The components of the Confederacy then owed allegiance to the Confederacy. Virginia had declared itself part of the Confederacy. How then can one argue that Lee committed treason?


583 posted on 07/29/2015 9:03:37 AM PDT by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]


To: HandyDandy

I can argue that Lee committed treason because, even though the Confederacy thought they were a nation, the rest of the United States disagreed with this contention. Hence, the whole Civil War thing.

Given that the United States considered the states of the Confederacy part of the Union, the acts of those fighting against the United States constituted treason.

There was one way for the acts of Lee (and the rest of the Army of the Confederacy) to be not considered treason. They would have to have won the war and actually constituted a separate nation.


589 posted on 07/29/2015 1:18:08 PM PDT by Team Cuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson