You keep on saying no, but you have yet to respond to my question as to whether Lee meets the definition of treason as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution. If you are so sure that he doesn’t meet this definition, surely you can tell us why.
You have written on this thread: “I also happen to believe that Lee was a honorable gentleman and a great general (the third best general of the Civil War, after all).”
I contend an honorable gentleman cannot be a tra***r. You have said the same.
I know I'm on shaky ground to cite you as a character reference. And yes, I know you have been all over the map on this.
I have been consistent.
“I intend to fight it out on this line if it takes all summer.”