Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK; PeaRidge
But there is just no possibility -- none, zero, nada -- that 165,000 very wealthy plantation owners accounted for any number remotely resembling 75% or even 50% of total US imports.

Then how about you tell me what the North was exporting at 25% of the total that is so valuable as to be worth the bulk of the imports? Once again the math doesn't seem to balance here.

At best, those future Confederate states may have accounted for a disproportionate 25% of all US imports, meaning about half of those imports went through Southern ports, and half through northern ports like New York.

Or, if you had happened to read what pea ridge said about the issue, the vast bulk of imports went to New York, and were packet line shipped elsewhere.

This is true on the face of it. Your fancy graphic showing where the money was getting collected is dominated by New York. Do you think New York alone earned all that money from their own exports?

479 posted on 07/27/2015 3:55:19 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Your comment to another: "Your fancy graphic showing where the money was getting collected is dominated by New York. Do you think New York alone earned all that money from their own exports?

You are correct . That diagram only shows the point of collection of the tariff charges.

The only diagram that would have any relevance here would be point of consumer payment or consumption of goods.

All of the prior posting comments about New York, wealthy plantation owners, etc. is all worthless speculation.

503 posted on 07/27/2015 1:37:46 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson