If trying to use facts in a discussion will get me canned, so be it. I always try to be polite, but apparently some don’t like others to have different opinions, and their preferred way of dealing with that is to silence the dissenter.
And here I always thought reversing Roe would mean returning the abortion issue to the states, which is where IMO it always should have been. In what way is that not a conservative position?
So, you're pro-choice-by-state? This policy WILL NOT save a SINGLE LIFE, it's no more than Pontius Pilate washing his hands of the matter.
YOUR approach is to let each state decide if a baby is a person or not. Ironically, that's the same failed approach that was applied to slavery.
I know you've been banned, but I'm going to answer you on the chance you'll read it and ponder, or at least that someone will.
States' Rights do not trump unalienable rights. Especially the supreme right, the right to live.
Neither the state nor the general government have any rights in this area at all. All they have is the DUTY to protect.
After all, that is the primary reason those governmetns exist.
This is kind of like the ABCs of American republican self-government.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are CREATED EQUAL, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men..."
As an opus goes, I’d give this about a 4.
Should’ve listened. I’ve seen this movie before. It always ends with lightning.