Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Gotta partially disagree with you on this one. New York was the primary point of entry because it was about the closest to Europe. A given ship could make more trips in a year, and more money for the owner, than by making the much longer trips to New Orleans.

Then why did exports flow from southern ports to Europe instead of being sent from there to New York and from New York overseas?

312 posted on 07/23/2015 10:20:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

I believe that is mostly what happened. Unless you choose to believe ships traveled from NYC empty to load cotton in southern ports. Or that they traveled empty from Europe to southern ports.

I believe most cotton was carried by coastal ships from the South to NYC, where it was loaded onto ships to cross the Atlantic. Presumably those ships loaded a good chunk of the imported goods to travel back to their southern ports.

NYC was the #1 cotton export port, followed by New Orleans and Mobile, but I think at quite some distance.


313 posted on 07/23/2015 10:35:30 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson