Uber is an app right? Nobody that drives or gets rides is employed by Uber right? Essentially it’s an app that lets those who need rides get connected with those who will give rides for a fee? Either the judge is clueless or in the unions pocket.
...or there is too much opportunity for Hannibal Lecter to pick up passengers.
“Nobody that drives or gets rides is employed by Uber right?”
Yeah, that was what they were trying to argue, but they already lost that fight in court. The government decides who is and who isn’t an employee, not the employer.