Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativejoy

I don’t disagree with this.

Something needs to be done about judicial activism and blatant abuse of power, and retention elections is not the thing to be done.

It’s going to have to be something with far more consequence than that.


4 posted on 07/14/2015 10:19:24 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chris37

I’m fine with retention elections with one tweak.

Rather than a vote by all the people, give that power to the state legislatures. The US supreme court might not be so willing to step on the state powers if the state held supreme court justices fate in their hands.


8 posted on 07/14/2015 10:25:16 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: chris37
It’s going to have to be something with far more consequence than that.

If Congress did their jobs none of this would be necessary. If we insist on sending immoral perverts and opportunistic frauds to serve in the Congress then this is what we get.

32 posted on 07/14/2015 10:57:35 AM PDT by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson