Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: buwaya

“Euro-American losses could thus be replaced, while the Indians, living in a subsistence economy with a low population replacement rate, could not.”

That’s it in a nutshell.


32 posted on 07/08/2015 5:02:11 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six

Despite occasional slaughter, the story of European settlers and native tribes was more coexistence to the point of intermarriage and genetic swamping than anyone getting killed off, truthfully. There’s a reason practically all old, native southern families have some legendary claim of indian ancestry. It’s because they do, way back, seventeenth century.


33 posted on 07/08/2015 5:15:41 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six

That and the Natives were still technologically in the Neolithic age. The didn’t work metal, weapons and tools were still knapped from stone. Other than dogs, no domesticated animals that I know of. There was no way that they were going to fend off the influx of Europeans.


42 posted on 07/08/2015 8:11:06 PM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six
That’s it in a nutshell.

It wasn't so much out breeding, it was out-immigrating. The Yankees replaced some of their losses during the War Between the States much the same way (while the Southern ports were blockaded).

43 posted on 07/08/2015 8:19:18 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson