Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
They compromised away the unalienable rights of their fellow man. They knew it. They did it anyway out of political expedience, because of the strident demands of the slave masters of the South.

Without who's support they could have never made it work anyways. So they made a devil's bargain, and then cheated.

That sound about right?

And the grandchildren of both sides paid the price for it in blood.

Not for slavery. For daring to think they could be free and independent while a Fanatic who thought otherwise was intent on sending the biggest army on the continent to stop them from leaving.

Once again, he wasn't going to stop them from slaving, just from leaving. After they put up such a vicious fight, he decided to go further, but it certainly wasn't his intention when he started the fight.

376 posted on 07/06/2015 7:34:33 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Not for slavery.

You've gone back around the circle.

But you can't fool me. Again, I've read the secession docs, all of them. The those who seceded made it abundantly clear that it was for slavery.

379 posted on 07/06/2015 7:39:48 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Polling: The dark art of .turning a liberal agenda into political reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson