Eisner made a generalization and we are saying that there are so many exceptions to his generalization that what he said is not really valid or true.
Unbelievably beautiful people are rare enough. Much more common in the context of Hollywood, true. Unbelievably beautiful people that are funny are even rarer. Much more common in the context of Hollywood, true. But there are still many more unbelievably beautiful people who aren’t funny, right?
I guess I must be missing something or maybe my standard of funny and unbelievably beautiful is too high. And I could care less what this stiff says, but he even said ‘usually’ not ‘with out exception.’
Freegards