The LIV will turn out in force for Hillary. Disgruntled Republicans will stay home and Conservatives will leave it blank if their candidate doesn’t win the primary. Christians, in great numbers, won’t vote, as usual.
IMO
Yeah, with so many journalist's on the family payroll, I'd say they're keeping her in the race.
I don't know of any Democrats who are affected by dishonesty...So to me, that's not a factor...
I am convinced that the 'powers that be' have determined we need a good liberal Republican in office to finish out the agenda of the New World Order...
Our fight will be in the primaries...
You are wrong. About 40% of the people who will actually get up and vote would vote for Hillary Clinton if she baked a newborn infant and ate it on national TV.
We are fighting for the squishy 25% in the middle.
But there are more than enough idiots in America to pull her over the finish line against another Bush or the Pillsbury Doughboy. Although she might actually compete for states like New Hampshire, Iowa and Pennsylvania.
The left can make a lot of noise about disliking her, but they will still line up to vote for her against any Republican. Don't forget that the left is also racist, despite their noise to the contrary. The lack of enthusiasm among black voters, who may turn out to vote in places like Philly and Cleveland at only 80% rates rather than 110%, may be more than offset by white liberal racists.
She will win even if indicted. Notice NO ONE has mentioned she might be indicted.
Your theory would make sense, if not for the fact that O’Bummer won the second time.
Everybody knew, and most voted for him anyway.
My dear ol' mother was right. 19A was the turning point for the nation and it has been all downhill since H.R. Res. 1 was proposed in 1919.
When pressed, most Hillary supporters say and believe that that she is a strong leader with experience, that it is time for a woman president, and that the Republican candidate -- whomever it will be -- is unacceptable for one reason or another. Note that the general tenor of the strength and experience arguments in favor of Hillary is such that they appeal to uninformed but instinctively conservative voters.
For a Republican to win the Presidency in such circumstances requires, among other things, luck, a favorable political environment based on issues and events, an appealing candidate, and a good campaign that generates a late campaign season surge that breaks through the news media's programming and liberal influence and engages voter attention in favor of the GOP candidate.
The last two Republican Presidential candidates to do that and take the presidency from the Democrats -- Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan -- had sharply divergent personalities but were shrewd political veterans who benefitted from a bad economy, social turmoil at home, and worries over national security and the country's standing overseas. Both also recognized that to win the required electoral votes, they needed to energize the GOP base, romance away some Democratic voters, and win the swing vote -- all at the same time. In the context of today, the difficulty of doing that can be expressed by a simple number: that Hillary Clinton, for all her faults and weaknesses, polls strongly.
Just remember, fake polling results were invented during the Clinton administration and have been used ever since. They eventually become self-fulfilling.
She is not going to lose fifty states. We have deep blue states out there that would elect a German Shepherd or a cinder block if it had a “D” next to its name.
That being said, she is a lousy candidate, and given a competent opponent, could lose. Which is why the elites are working to hard to get Jeb Bush the GOP nod.
My opinion?
You’re ugly and your mother dresses you funny.
America will either learn history's lesson, or will collapse of it's own greed and stupidity like other nations have.
I suppose the lesson Conservatives could learn is, never allow your opposition to control the message and define you.
See, the problem was....there was no opposition.
Hollywood/academia became leftist institutions of indoctrination, and did so with very little push-back.
...there was no war, there wasn't even a battle(well, maybe McCarthy)...they just took it over.
Does that mean we should roll-over and die as the progressives wish?
....absolutely not, but in my opinion the "political" war is a lost cause, it's simply become too corrupt, and as such, a worthless weapon to fight a culture war.
No, each one of us has to find ways in our own lives to fight against the tyranny, too many have sacrificed everything for us to sit by and allow America's destruction from within.
...what's that line from The Ten Commandments?
"...I owe that to my fathers, not to my sons..."
I will not say more because I will just assume you are young and naive.