Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Marie

That there was NO divorce till Henry VIII is not really accurate.

Divorces were routine among the nobility and especially royalty, bought and paid for to the pope. Papal dispensation, sudden discovery of invalidating degree of kinship, etc. Part of Henry’s outrage at being denied on by the pope is that they were so common for kings.

Elanor of Aquitane, for instance, divorced the King of France and married the King of England.

If I remember correctly, the Pope even provided a dispensation for one Emperor to commit bigamy.

The pope in Henry’s case probably did not develop a sudden rush of integrity to the brain. He was a prisoner of the Emperor, a nephew of Catharine, and simply wasn’t free to gratify Henry.


75 posted on 06/26/2015 1:38:10 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
Actually, Henry 8 went to the Pope a little too often for comfort. Also, the royals of the medieval and Tudor period married within too close degrees of consanguinity due to their insistence of keeping their lands within their own control. Marrying outside of a close relative meant a dilution of wealth. (Land was the most important sign of wealth.) Then they'd bug the poor Pope for an annulment using all types of excuses. Some he would grant, others he would not. Just ask Wolsey and Cromwell.
82 posted on 06/26/2015 1:50:51 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson