Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

NORM: “That’s resulted in a net fail over 30 years.”

C’mon, you’re avoiding the key question here.

Of course, voting over 30 years for imperfect candidates hasn’t helped things at all.

But if all conservatives did as you did (sit out elections because you have the choice between a RINO and an evil Marxist), the past 30 years would have been 100% worse than it is even now. Get it?

The real question you need to ask yourself is do you want someone who is 100% evil (Obama) or someone who doesn’t have the exact values you want, but has a lot of them where it counts (e.g. free market capitalism and strong foreign policy). You cannot argue that Romney didn’t have a strong kick-ass economic policy.

The debate is clearly over whether the world would be in such disarray if Romney was president and not Obama. Obama takes the cake.

See my post #118 and watch the vid.

There’s still time to change your mind and not be so obstinate about voting to vote AGAINST the worst candidate.


248 posted on 06/26/2015 12:25:22 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: AlanGreenSpam

You committed category error. There are no key questions.


254 posted on 06/26/2015 12:28:55 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

To: AlanGreenSpam

Romney was a turd who deserves to be flushed


256 posted on 06/26/2015 12:29:40 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

To: AlanGreenSpam

Romney would appoint leftist judges, we would still get ObamaCare and we would still have gay marriage forced down our throats.

Romney would be about as bad as Obama

............

I want to vote FOR someone, not against someone. Give us someone to vote FOR.


260 posted on 06/26/2015 12:32:22 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

To: AlanGreenSpam; Norm Lenhart; wmfights; Signalman; onyx; xzins; KC_Lion; Jim Robinson; jazusamo; ...
But if all conservatives did as you did (sit out elections because you have the choice between a RINO and an evil Marxist), the past 30 years would have been 100% worse than it is even now. Get it?

Frankly, I can't think of a SINGLE THING that would have happened much differently regardless of which party was in the White House and don't forget that for a majority of the time in question the GOP controlled one or both houses in Congress.

The debate is clearly over whether the world would be in such disarray if Romney was president and not Obama. Obama takes the cake.

Hell, Romney paved the way for Obama.

You seem to forget that Romney is the architect of sodomite "marriage" and that Romneycare (complete with taxpayer-funded abortion) is the prototype for Obamacare.

There’s still time to change your mind and not be so obstinate about voting to vote AGAINST the worst candidate.

I'm pretty sure that the Politburo said the same thing fifty years ago when they were deciding between Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev. In the end, the Politburo members mostly got to keep their limousines, luxury apartments, dachas, special stores, etc., while the Russian people suffered.

The goals of the Democrats and Republicans are pretty much the same, there's just a different order and they use different terminology.

278 posted on 06/26/2015 12:40:13 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson