Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PaForBush

The Supremes should have term limits.


14 posted on 06/26/2015 9:08:16 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: b4its2late

Well not sure about term limits. If we had term.limits, neither Scalia or Clarence Thomas would still be in the court. Just saying. It all comes back to who is president and what sort of judges that president appoints.


25 posted on 06/26/2015 9:13:12 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late

All depends on who is president when their terms are up, could be a bad thing.


67 posted on 06/26/2015 9:41:53 AM PDT by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late
The Supremes should have term limits.

No. Rather, the Congress should uphold the oath to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies.

And the citizens should hold their elected representatives accountable to that oath.

177 posted on 06/26/2015 10:58:55 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson