Posted on 06/26/2015 6:43:16 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
Sarah Palin's 24-year-old daughter revealed on Thursday that she is pregnant with her second child, and it sounds like it wasn't planned. Interestingly, Bristol does not reveal who the father of her unborn child is.
(Excerpt) Read more at celebrity.yahoo.com ...
I shall devour them if they attempt it. I am the Eater of Men.
Cannibalism is NOT mentioned in the Bible as a sin.
She would be marrying well below her station. But if she would have me...then absolutely.
Maybe she’s a pain in the butt.
Bristol has been ‘giving the talk’ about abstinence - professionaly.
Paid quite handsomely for it too.
I’m criticizing her because she was an abstinent advocate who I followed on Facebook and Patheos - I was abused a year ago for taking up her side because of some dido of hers. Now I feel hurt and betrayed by her negligent facebook post. I must admit, the bloom was off the rose when she was caught wearing a “thong” dress and using the F word over and over again while talking to cops. She couldn’t have that much money - so Todd and Sarah are going to have to provide cover for her and her two babies. Poor Sarah. Who I continue to admire. Her kid? No so much.
Of course not, you’re jumping to conclusions. I’m suggesting she stop sleeping around. You seem to imply that it is simply today’s culture and that nothing can be done, I say bologna. These children are her responsibility and I would hope that this would help her make a choice of abstinence until there is a father helping her out.
All single mothers should be “supported”, but don’t make the mistake of “encouraging” this behavior. There is a difference.
So the woman who made serious cash LECTURING others on abstinence doesn’t want to be LECTURED for not practicing what she preaches. Got it. Once again, a supposed conservative shoots herself in the foot and invites criticism of conservative hypocrisy. Thanks, Bristol. (A woman who nobody would have heard of if not for who her mother is.)
One more brain cell leaves her head and she’ll be lonely.
Why would we be “disappointed”? I don’t want to screw her.
” freely admit I am a freakin’ hypocrite because I have bedded everything on God’s green Earth without a full coat of fur and hooves.”
Don’t many liberal chicks not shave their legs, and those uncared for feet could be considered hooves. So, maybe, just maybe, you have actually bedded things with full coats of fur and hooves.
Well we don't know who the Dad is and I have heard that he left because he found out that she was pregnant with another guy's baby. So until I find out for sure, I won't bash him. This is her second “oops”....she is a mess. Sorry but that is the truth. She runs around the country yelling keep your legs closed but she is the one running around the neighborhood screwing anyone who is available. Why would you stick up to that behavior? I know you're not liberal but in this case, you have the emotions of a liberals.
GG was talking about having Bristol. Yes Both Todd and Sarah have a cross to bear with Bristol. Bristol has made Sarah a laughing stock for over 6 years now. Bristol has done more damage to Sarah then the worst liberal could hope to do. I feel sorry for Todd and Sarah to have such a horrid child. God does not give you more then you can handle, but when he gave them Bristol, he took it to the limit that is for sure.
I never stuck up for the behavior. I made it clear that I didn’t. But the behavior is over. The pregnancy is not.
The liberal position would be a call for an abortion.
The liberal position would be a call for an abortion.
That is true, but I have carefully read every post on this thread and NO ONE is calling for her to have an abortion or even hinted that way. For that I am grateful.
She is being criticized because she is a repeat offender who makes a living telling people not to do exactly what she consistently does. She has proven to be very hypocritical. As for the Media, of course they are going to jump on this. Bristol is not known for being vague in her opinions. She throws it out like a 90 mph pitch to the face and God forbid you don’t see it her way. Now, she is suddenly caught with her pants down, blames other people (the trolls), proves that she is a hypocrite in multiple statements and people on this site are actually questioning why so many are disappointed and making negative statements? Take a step back from being a fanatic and look at the situation logically.
“Posts like yours encourage quiet abortions.”
By the same logic, condemning rapists would also encourage quiet abortions.
Your post makes no sense.
“Pro-life FReepers are being hypocrites too.”
Pro-life means loving innocent babies, not their slutty mothers that sleep around and try to raise the innocent children without fathers. The most pro-life position to take is to lovingly put both her babies for adoption in a house with father.
Both the rapist male and the slutty female can be condemned without condemning the conceived innocent baby.
Sorry. I shouldn’t have posted that — and had no idea what a depraved person you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.