This stuff is cool. The genealogy world is getting into this DNA arena.
I’m a bit skeptical about the quality of the comparison data.
I'm a bit skeptical about the Kennewick Man DNA.
8,500 years old.
Found buried just below the bottom of a river.
How long was it exposed to or saturated by flowing fresh water?
Decades? Centuries?
Hard to believe that would not seriously degrade the DNA in the skeleton.