Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker; All

(1) Film slowed down (but not enough, jumps don’t correlate with how high they’d go if they were in true 1/6 gravity)

How much was it slowed down and under what method? Did they over-crank or high speed? How much film was produced for 50+ hours of coverage (plus personal film shots)?

How were they able to connect the films, convert the format for TV, keep the rolls without noticeable splices, scratches or dust?

How high can an astronaut jump, with full gear, with little or no knee bending, on the Earth and the moon?


(2) lunar dust displays

Large low-pressure room, film slowed down, also dust didn’t go high enough to properly represent 1/6 gravity).

3) Apollo 15 “hammer vs feather” display

Large low-pressure room, for the feather as close to vacuum as possible

Can you provide some more technical details (1969 technology) about this large low pressure room (dimensions, lighting, etc.,) capable of holding the lander, and accommodating a lunar rover going about. The largest vacuum chamber in the world belongs to NASA (100’ wide by 155’ tall and is cylindrical). It’s used to pressure-test rocket stages.

Also, can you express in a mathematical equation the proper height and shape the lunar dust should had been (same goes for the objects thrown by the astronauts). You can also explain the proper shape and height had it been on Earth (you know, your secret, underground, Art Bell approved, large vacuum chamber)?

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1855.html

Can you explain to me what is wrong with with following segment, in mathematical terms, when the following astronaut throws a plastic bag. How far, high, and time must it had taken?

1:25 mark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxZMjpMhwNE


(4) zero atmosphere

Pump it out. Probably can’t get to zero, but who knows? What if it’s done in a converted subterranean military chamber - blast doors on either side could bear something very close to actual vacuum.

You kind of lost me there. “What if it’s done in a subterranean military chamber” doesn’t sound like an answer but more like speculation (which is not an answer). Can you give me 1969 (heck, I’d take a 2015 answer) explanation on building such a HUGE vacuum chamber when the biggest one to date is only a 100’ by 155’ cylinder.


(5) photographs (shadow angles, pictures in shadow, no stars, etc.,)

LOL, that’s on my side - many, many problems with those things discussed everywhere.

You mean this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnrPaz3xFIg&index=14&list=PLwhjFBLTueU8QbATZ5X_Kstma8zHtY48O

Or this iconic photo?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KRohmGzN6A&index=12&list=PLwhjFBLTueU8QbATZ5X_Kstma8zHtY48O


(6) floating in zero G.

Low Earth orbit with blacked-out windows -as far as perhaps they actually went before splashing back down a week later. Slip-ups on the bright Earth outside a window when they were supposedly halfway to the moon have already been found.

Okay, so what you’re saying is that didn’t go to the moon but just floated around in orbit for a week? And nobody noticed...not even the Russians.

“Hey Ivan, look at this...NASA says they’re on to the moon but the command module/lunar lander just keeps circling the Earth. Hmmmmm, better keep quite about this and not tell our superiors. If we did, the Illuminati will be very mad at us.”

Look, you started off on cameras, then it went to no humans made it to the moon, now it’s a secret military underground vacuum chamber (something that’s never been done on that scale especially with 1969 tech). The speaker on the youtube file Moon Landings Faked? Filmmaker Says Not! said it best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

11:43 mark

“Once you’re forced to hypothesize whole new technologies to keep your conspiracy possible, you’ve stepped over into the realm of magic. It demands a deep and abiding faith in things you can never know.”


83 posted on 06/17/2015 11:18:16 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker; All

1960’s largest vacuum chamber was...

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/webb/news/chamber-a.htmlhttp://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/webb/news/chamber-a.html

Chamber A is now the largest high-vacuum, cryogenic-optical test chamber in the world, and made famous for testing the space capsules for NASA’s Apollo mission, with and without the mission crew. It is 55 feet (16.8 meters) in diameter by 90 feet (27.4 meters) tall. The door weighs 40 tons and is opened and closed hydraulically.

Oh wait, wasn’t it your supposed secret military underground complex....ahhhhh...riiiiiiight.

Paging Art Bell


84 posted on 06/17/2015 11:24:19 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: ak267

Whatever. I’m not here to convince you. Your casual use of derogatory comments and generalized pseudo-scientific arguments marks you as a waste-shill looking to pick everything apart and dodge the things you can’t. There’s plenty of discussion of this issue on the Net, anyone who wants can look as deeply as they want.

Bye.


85 posted on 06/17/2015 11:33:58 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson