I know it doesn't work with your narrative that now the police are stating that only three police fired, and those three fired a total of 12 rounds. So what will your response be when the autopsies the come back?
I do not have a narrative.
If you will read my posting, you will see that my main interest is in the Constitutional issues that the incident raises.
I think it was yesterday that I raised the question of whether the law under which they were arrested and placed under $1,000,000 bonds will hold up. Saying that how a person is dressed gives probable cause to arrest seems to fly in the face of the First Amendment.
I wonder if it has ever been done before.
I guess that would depend on what is (or is not) in them.
“So what will your response be when the autopsies the come back? “
And just where are those autopsies? You can’t tell me that they are not long done. They should be released to the public, but they aren’t so what are we left to believe? Nine dead with the cops already admitting that they killed 4 of them. At the end of the day I will be surprised if at least 8 and maybe all 9 died at the hands of the police.
Let me see how this logic works: Someone in a crowd opens fire on someone else in the crowd so the police kill nine people to prevent anyone from getting hurt.
Isn't that the same thing as destroying a village in order to save it?