[You did not answer the question. Is it true or merely heresay? And what does “abuse” or “molestation” in this instance mean? It has not been defined nor elaborated on. Am I guilty for asking the question?]
No you are right on for asking. According to the interviews (parents and daughters) the “molestation and abuse” amounted to a 14 year old boy (their brother) inappropriately TOUCHING the girls. Most of the time it happened, the girls were not aware of it, and only learned of it after their 14 year old brother confessed to the parents.
I can see how some mind-fouled people can consider what 14 year old Josh did to these young girls to be much, much more egregious than the Gov. of Arkansas raping
Miss Broderick, and then taking advantage of a 22 year girl in the Oval Office when he was first dick.