Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria

If the town wanted the tree to stay, buy the property. If you don’t buy the property, shut up! Same goes for everyone who like to look at the tree.


2 posted on 05/14/2015 4:05:54 PM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GilesB
Same goes for everyone who like to look at the tree.

....or uses the word "pristine," in describing someone else's property.

6 posted on 05/14/2015 4:08:04 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Hi! We're having a constitutional crisis. Come on over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GilesB
I'm so glad that we conservatives have no use whatsoever for consideration of the community we live in. Yeah, hell, F* em. Cut her down. Now that's a "developer" for you. Fine sense of citizenship.
7 posted on 05/14/2015 4:10:42 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GilesB

Yep.


25 posted on 05/14/2015 6:37:33 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GilesB

Unfortunately, too many trees are being cut down by developers when they could have saved some of them.

I finally saw one developer in North Arlington, Va. actually save a couple beautiful, tall trees on a triangular corner lot to provide the house in the center of the land, with shade.

In most other cases, they clear-cut everything over 2 inches high. Now a lot of Arlington looks like a liberal, urban desert - lots of concrete, asphalt, potholes, pot heads, and no grass, trees, butterflies, or even honey bees.

The first thing many Hispanic immigrants (probably legal ones), did in my neighborhood when they moved in was to cut down tall (75 ft+) old oak trees from a stand that was behind all of our block’s houses, North and South. They wanted to see the apartment complex directly behind them.

They also wiped out most oldgrowth hedges/roses, etc.

We live in what was part of George Washington’s private lands, i.e. Geo. Washington Forest. What is left has beautiful trees, Barcroft Park and Creek, deer, raccoons, a silver-tail fox, possums, lots of birds (once saw a Baltimore Oriole), snakes, rabbits, an occasional lizard and dragon flies.

I grow milkweed for the Monarch butterflies, and have a Buddleia butterfly bush for the rest of the gang (Swallowtails, Fritillaries, Cabbages and Sulfurs, Painted Lady/Red Admiral, Grey Hairstreaks, etc.) My children and granddaughter grew up with flowers, birds, and butterflies/insects all around us.

Other kids grew up in f*cking backyard deserts and never got to appreciate what we were given by Nature.

Responsible development is the key to keeping a neighborhood looking nice, helping keep the air clean, and having living creatures run across your yards for all to see.

I like private property rights, so I’m not going to comment on this case as I do know see all the information in the article which we would need to make a reasoned appraisal of this particular case.

However, too many so-called conservatives are ready to give less-then-concerned citizen developers the right to create an urban/suburban desert of concrete and asphalt where a little planning could keep the area a livable clean and green area.

PS: I’ve worked in the field of toxic waste site cleanups for over 20 years, saving the taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, or more in cleanup costs, while not damning those who intentionally or accidentally (WW2) polluting the environment. There are ways to correct a bad situation without nuking everyone.


26 posted on 05/14/2015 6:38:56 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (madmax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson