Posted on 05/13/2015 5:23:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Brown's first trial ended in 2006, with two jurors voting to convict him of first-degree murder, eight voting for second-degree murder and two favoring manslaughter. In 2009, a jury split evenly between second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter.
Apodaca, the third jury’s foreman, said it took one day of deliberations for the entire jury to agree. A key to the case, he said, was an expert witness who said the girl's injuries were inconsistent with a slip or trip and instead suggested that she was thrown.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
4 years that is 48 months, 3 months per trimester = 16 trimesters, + 3 trimesters before she was born = 19 trimesters...
I am surprised some lib hasn’t claimed this was just a 19th trimester abortion....
scant little real REAL difference between live birth abortions and post birth abortions.
I sense the PERP puke wont do well in prison
I vote to remove his ability to reproduce, minimum sentence.
“A key to the case, he said, was an expert witness”
“Laub told jurors that evidence in the case did not prove Brown set out to kill his child, but instead painted him as a lousy father and unlikable person. The prosecution of Brown, who was arrested in 2003, was propelled by an emotional reaction to the death of a young child, he said.”
That’s it, that’s all it takes. Just personal opinion,
impression and a possibly trumped up motive is all it takes to get a first degree murder conviction. They had more
evidence with OJ.
No evidence, witnesses or confession just the jury’s emotions.
The guy probably did it but it could have been an
accident as well. No one really knows but him, that’s it.
Honestly either there is more evidence or they were driven
to convict someone no matter what.
Set all the emotions aside and there is very little to
go on. He should get an appeal. This just don’t sound right.
Libs can’t do that kind of math. They’d say it was just a post-term abortion.
Drop him off a much lower cliff....repeatedly.
The Bobbitt Procedure?
An Ex is a has been. A spurt is a drip under pressure.
L
One expert witness led to the guilty verdict.
ONE !!!!!!!!!
Frightening IMHO.
.
One expert soothsayer.
New Rome doesn’t want proof but desires the Spectacle instead. If a man might be innocent and grieving the death of his child, New Rome wants him tortured and mutilated in prison. New Rome would prefer to have it all televised, though, to instill its cruel nature into its fatherless children earlier in their lives.
Have fun. Enjoy the curse.
Yep - frightening that such testimony could result in a guilty verdict - the system requires proof beyond reasonable doubt and is supposed to be based on the premise that it’s better to let 100 guilty off the hook than to convict one innocent. How things have changed ....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.