Replies

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction/abuse of pre-pubescent children. Very few priests have been charged with this crime. What you must be referring to is homosexuality, as 90% of the crimes in relation to the Catholic Church have been priests and post-pubescent boys.

Who came up with the standard excuse? What year? Yours is not the first usage of this claim that the unholy fathers were just homos not pedophiles. It is unbelievably repugnant. Unless you were there you have NO clue how the 'prepubescent' boys were schooled to be ever so willing to service these unholy freaks.

Would you call a change in charges from aggravated assault to aggravated battery an excuse for aggravated assault? The facts, which are in no way less reprehensible than pedophilia, simply make clear that homosexual men took their immoral satanic pleasure with middle school and high school boys.

You make a further claim of grooming, but I don't know of any evidence. Do you have any? I am not saying it couldn't have happened, but charges should be based on evidence. You state that one needs to have been there to exonerate the unholy freaks. Were you there? And if so, an anecdote is of minor significance.