Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Telepathic Intruder

I meant the actual fusion thing. What I am curious about is the timeframe.

I would assume the core being the highest pressure/temp is the starting point, but considering the sheer mass/size of a star, how fast does the entire ‘star’ become involved in the reaction? is it more a ‘slow burn’ or ‘blinding flash”?


24 posted on 05/11/2015 2:29:50 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart
I'm not exactly sure how it works in brown dwarfs fusing deuterium, which is only a tiny fraction of the total hydrogen, but stars only fuse elements in the core. When that's used up, the star dies. The more massive the star, the shorter the lifespan on the order of around mass to the power of -3.5. This is a lengthy topic, however, but the Wiki page should give you a decent overview:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_evolution
29 posted on 05/11/2015 3:33:50 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Norm Lenhart

Actually that’s mass^-2.5, but minor point. For example, a star twice the mass of our sun will last 18% as long, or 1.8 billion years. Half the mass, 5.6 times as long.


32 posted on 05/11/2015 3:40:54 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson