Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
See #28.

I disagree with #28. I have 3 watches that I've owned for decades. They work perfectly fine and weren't very expensive. They are stylish, accurate, sturdy and don't require much maintenance at all (a battery and cleaning every year or so, no software updates, no daily charging, etc.).

I don't have any need or desire to see text messages on my wrist when I can pull out my phone to see them. If I want to monitor my heart while jugging I'll wear a cheaper and easier device to do so... many exist on the market.

Smart watches simply don't fill any need for me... they would only add the burden of yet another device that needs constant charging, software updates, hardware updates and so on. I don't need or want any of that... I want my life to be simpler, not more complicated.

34 posted on 05/01/2015 9:37:00 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Cementjungle

OK, so it’s not a product _for_you_. Doesn’t mean that millions of others don’t have need/desire to quick-check messages & other notifications without drawing out the phone, or don’t want/need to monitor whatever health factors without additional dedicated hardware.

If all you want is the time conflated with jewelry, then the Watch is not for you.
I’m just perplexed that so many people in that position insist the Watch is a POS waste of money for everyone and heap derision & abuse upon those who find it a worthwhile product.


39 posted on 05/01/2015 11:12:29 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Hillary:polarizing/calculating/disingenuous/insincere/ambitious/inevitable/entitled/overconfident/se)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson