and yeah, there's probably some photoshopping going on there too.
All photographs that appear in mass media are in some way massaged by Adobe Creative Suite (Photoshop, mostly). This isn’t necessarily an insult to the model or photographer, or even a deception deception, but necessary to make the image reproduce well. Sometimes photographs don’t represent reality and they have to be manipulated a little. As an example, few people look as good in a photograph as they do in real life. Is it more truthful to print the ugly picture, or one that’s more representative of their impression when you meet them in real life?