Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network

1. Governor Palin would be a better president than Walker and probably better than Cruz.

2. Candidate Palin would split the conservative vote three ways instead of two ways, and that increases the chance of nominating Jeb Bush,

3. Cheerleader Sarah has the ability to get the grass roots motivated without drawing effective fire from the chattering journalist class,

Had Sarah run in 2012, as I hoped and expected that she would, I would have worked for her full time for free. If she announces for 2016, I will give her campaign serious consideration. However, my initial impulse is that America is better off with her not running than with her in the race. We cannot afford to nominate Jeb Bush, leading to Hillary winning, but Cruz or Walker would have a good chance to win. Besides, I rather like the idea of Cruz nominating and a conservative Senate confirming Supreme Court Justice Palin - that would make enough liberal heads explode to light up our lives for years.


47 posted on 04/28/2015 6:31:47 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

Walker is losing Wisconsin BADLY.

Walker will lose Wisconsin and most other blue states.

Just as Romney did.

Just as Romney lost Massachusetts even with himself on the ticket.

Just as he lost Wisconsin even with Paul Ryan on the ticket.

Blue state Republicans DO NOT win national elections.


92 posted on 04/29/2015 7:28:38 AM PDT by hrh40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson