Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

It’s surprising how people jump to conclusions. The PU was fine in the left lane when the incident started. He had a car in front of him and couldn’t go any faster.

The Camaro driver was drunk and drove like it. After the initial attempted cutoff, THEN the PU started messing with the guy on purpose. I don’t get the impression the PU would have held next to the truck under normal circumstances. So, not a left-lane vigilante, just taking advantage of his position to rub it in on the Camaro after that driver drove like an ass.

So, I give the Camaro 95% of the blame, the PU driver 5%. The Camaro should have taken his medicine, but then he was drunk on that non-dangerous alcohol stuff that doesn’t make one act violently.


30 posted on 04/27/2015 5:17:05 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Life is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods

“I don’t get the impression the PU would have held next to the truck under normal circumstances.”

True.

I think the PU made his point a bit long, but still, all the Camaro ever would have had to do was back off the PU tail and I figure the PU would have then passed the truck.

Camaro driver was drunk, as was apparent in he couldn’t judge his lane changes.


42 posted on 04/27/2015 5:29:32 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson