Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

Multi system redundancy can make a good system but less than a perfect one. If a system has to drop a transaction, something suffers.

Claims of risk should be backed up by more than just reiterating the claim. There are plausible risks to an approach like this, such as both kernels needing to be able to support the kernel-to-kernel handoff and having a bug doing so. But they should be listed, not just handwaving engaged in.


14 posted on 04/27/2015 7:08:32 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
Claims of risk should be backed up

Right, we assume things have no risk.

We should have to prove there is a potential risk before we acknowledge there is one.

I mean, really, hot kernel updates. I can't think of any possible malicious outcome that makes use of that feature.

monday morning sarc for you HTR ! :)

you likey ? :)

Yes - I have had a coffee !
17 posted on 04/27/2015 7:21:40 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson