I did posit that it suits me just fine if nailing Hillary Clinton at A time that is inconvenient to her and convenient for us, meaning,.... Ray....closer-to-the-election.
I was not necessarily recommending anything, I just said it suits me just fine. What I DO recommend is what Gowdy recommends— that we have direct E V I D E N C E.
You don’t really seem to give a damn if we have
E V I D E N C E. You seem to just want the noise and the show.
Sorry, I’m done with your toy games. But, thanks anyway.
Besides, the point is mute as of today since she will be appearing before the committee in May.
A subpoena is not “noise and show” it is how to get evidence.