Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: X-spurt

Because there is zero evidence that Scott shot Slager with the taser.

Because Slager never said that Scott shot him with the taser, and nowhere in any of the reports or recordings that have been released has anyone ever said that Scott shot Slager with the taser.

Because Scott would never have had the opportunity to shoot Slager with the taser. There is no doubt that Slager shot Scott with the taser - so, when did Scott have enough time (and separation from Slager) to reload the cartridge so he could shoot Slager?

Because I live in the world of evidence. You can spin all of the hypothetical possibilities of what might theoretically have happened between Scott and Slager. If ya can’t prove it, it didn’t happen.


50 posted on 04/17/2015 3:39:26 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

AND in fact... Before the video EVIDENCE was released, Slager actually moved the taser next to Scott’s body. He didn’t put that in his report.

Wonder what he was thinking?

Did he lie in his report?

More broadly speaking, do some police officers lie in their official reports? What is the rank of evidence from police testimony and reports? Pretty high up there?

I don’t think most do, so I’m not painting with a broad brush, BUT for those cops that would move evidence/perjure/lie/file false reports, I have nothing but anger and hatred. THOSE need to spend MORE time in jail than normal citizens for doing such things, because of the trust, authority and responsibilities we give them as officers.


55 posted on 04/17/2015 3:59:27 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Because I live in the world of evidence.?

Don’t we all. I doubt you have any, ANY hard evidence by which to be thumping you “self assuming authoritative” chest.

How do you know the cop did not know the perp was in control of the taser?

Which points to the FACT your opinion is no more valid than anyone’s opinion.

But one thing is evidence, the perp gave a false ID, ran, fought the cop, the cop and perp had some tangle in the taser wires, all of which gets to the laws of engagement that requires the cop to stop the perp by any means at his disposal at that point. Had he not stopped the perp and the perp then hurt or killed someone else, you and all the others would be screaming “the damn cop just let him get away”.


58 posted on 04/17/2015 4:12:38 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson