Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paisan
But, he is now recognized as the country’s greatest president, having stayed the course in keeping the Union together.

Wait, was the war about slavery or keeping the union together with violence and bloodshed? Confusing, Lincoln cultists never get their stories straight.

10 posted on 04/14/2015 7:10:05 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

Wait, was the war about slavery or keeping the union together with violence and bloodshed? Confusing, Lincoln cultists never get their stories straight.


Lincoln himself said his first priority was holding the Union together.

Revisionist history rolls on.


13 posted on 04/14/2015 7:13:30 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
Wait, was the war about slavery or keeping the union together with violence and bloodshed? Confusing, Lincoln cultists never get their stories straight.

Both. It was about keeping the Union together and eradicating the scourge of chattel slavery. Not so confusing, but then again, Neoconfederate fetishists aren't so bright.

15 posted on 04/14/2015 7:15:47 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
Wait, was the war about slavery or keeping the union together with violence and bloodshed? Confusing, Lincoln cultists never get their stories straight.

Initially, the Civil War was about keeping the Union together. Not ony most Northerners but a significant minority of Southerners supported that cause. Then Lincoln made a major strategic mistake with the emancipation proclamation, which made the war seem to be "about" slavery. This made him wildly unpopular among many stalwart Unionists who (rightly) thought they were dealt a bait and switch, told that they were fighting to preserve the Union, a cause they believed to be worth fighting for, but were now told that they were fighting to end slavery.

Even anti-slavery northerners were generally not willing to fight and die, or see their sons and brothers fight and die to end slavery (and rightly so - "ending slavery" wasn't worth 600K + lives and a ruined nation). With the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln not only lost most sympathy in the South, but he lost a lot of political capital in the North as well. While only a small number of Northerners went "Copperhead," he wasn't exactly the most popular man among Union soldiers either.

72 posted on 04/14/2015 8:28:26 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va; All

Lincoln was a mass murderer for slaughtering Southerners


97 posted on 04/14/2015 9:17:24 AM PDT by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

And with you Johnny Reb wannabes it ‘’States rights’’. To do what? Own slaves. How come you never finish that sentence?


163 posted on 04/14/2015 2:37:59 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson