To: Eric Pode of Croydon
If it was so insignificant, why did the fool run as well as put up a fight. The fight itself would be resisting arrest and the chase would most likely be eluding, both felonies where I live. There would have been other charges I am sure.
32 posted on
04/13/2015 7:18:35 AM PDT by
biff
(Et Tu Boeh-ner)
To: biff
Argue it with SLED. They are who charged him.
33 posted on
04/13/2015 7:57:36 AM PDT by
sport
To: biff
"The fight itself would be resisting arrest and the chase would most likely be eluding, both felonies where I live."
So, if someone has a problem with vehicle equipment, a non-moving violation and maybe a civil court case (like child support) and runs from police for whatever reason, police can shoot him or her in the back.
That's one way for the government-paid, political/regulator class folks controlling the cops to get rid of any potential business and political competition from the dwindling true private sector. Looks like they've been trying to overthrow the government step by step. It's no wonder that they've been pushing the Article V Convention scam. They're trying to legitimize their other recent activities.
What a plan for anarcho-communist dependents of big government spending (e.g., the Clinton's expansion of federal pork to state and local governments). Pass extreme numbers of un-American laws (regulations, anti-family laws, etc.) and start killing everyone else off.
37 posted on
04/13/2015 1:45:15 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson