Attempts at lobbying for their reversal is what I’m talking about.
Although it is true (AFAIK) that no church has accepted money from pro-abortionists for the lobby efforts thereof.
The point is is that lobbying will be unsuccessful in both cases. And openly accepting money from the attackers of religious freedom in any case is a dangerous precedent.
I might also add the attacks on religion by Obamacare, which also will not be successfully lobbied away, in spite of waivers that make people feel comfortable under the law at present.
...and well the supporters of homosexual marriage may say
that giving money to supporters of traditional marriage sets a dangerous precedent.
It’s ONE idea to resist what’s going on - it doesn’t have to be the ONLY idea. In a war you use everything at your disposal.
What’s your idea?