Okay; it seems that you are agreeing with my stance at least somewhat. Alinsky presumes that those who live up to their own book of rules will be tripped up by attempting to, but this is a case where such people did so and are being persecuted.
Just because a judge says someone does not have a religious objection does not mean the judge is telling the truth.
It is one thing to cite statistics of people falling away from morality, but to suggest that one give in to the encroaching immorality instead of fighting back, when one is minded to fight back (and thus not falling away) is not a valid religious stance.
Show us where that has occurred
It just paranoia. And to consider that brainwashed brainwashed is pure ridiculousness
End of conversation
end