Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainlion

The Russians had crap leadership until Zhukov was put in charge, and honestly I think even he is very overrated. Stalin had purged the leadership of the Red Army in the 1930s and it was very evident when the Germans invaded. That’s why they got plowed early on and lost so many men. Then even with Zhukov in charge, they didn’t really follow a tactical style which cared much about casualties. Zhukov was pretty happy to trade blood for victory, which was unlike either the Allies or the Germans.

The Mosin Nagant is really nothing special as rifles go. It’s another bolt action firing a powerful cartridge (quite comparable to the Mauser K-98 or the Springfield 03). Honestly I don’t see that it can be either credited or discredited all that much. It worked for the job at hand. It wasn’t revolutionary like the Garand or STG-43.


48 posted on 04/10/2015 9:36:05 AM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: drbuzzard
The Mosin Nagant is really nothing special as rifles go.

That it handles it's rimmed cartridge with a very high level of reliability is a good trick.

It worked for the job at hand. It wasn’t revolutionary like the Garand or STG-43.

Not in this century, nor the last one. But in the year 1891, when it began replacing the Russian single shot Krnka roughly equivalent to the U.S. 45-70 Trapdoor Springfield? Oh yes; revolutionary enough.

53 posted on 04/10/2015 10:01:23 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson