Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rickmichaels
This article is a bore. Old arguments long ago debunked. There isn't a creditable historian or theologian that denies the historical person of Jesus of Nazareth. Remember how Pontius Pilate was not an historical person... debunked. Wise men a myth... debunked

This issue is not historical facts, but whether one believes Jesus is the Christ. Be honest and say you do not believe in GOD reveal in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Don't cover you unbelief and rejection with an argument that GOD does not exist.

21 posted on 04/03/2015 7:46:56 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Commandment

“...the historical person of Jesus of Nazareth.”

The town of Nazareth was so small. (”How small was it!?)

It was so small it is ONLY mentioned in the Bible in reference to Jesus. Joesephus doesn’t mention it. (Some historian in 4th century AD mentions it).

Archaelogists discovered it years later.

But sort of like the coins recently found showing King David. Up until then his kingdom was never in the archaeologic record - so the whole David thing was a “myth”.


51 posted on 04/03/2015 10:51:08 AM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson